| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Day Log |
||
Two Faces, One Coin Part 2: Enduring Freedom In Popular Culture |
||
|
“After the September 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the United States military entered into a war against global terrorism. The military response to the 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States was assigned the name Operation Enduring Freedom.” The initial military objectives of Operation Enduring Freedom articulated by President Bush in his October 7, 2001 address to the country included the destruction of terrorist training camps and infrastructure within Afghanistan, the capture of al Qaeda leaders, and the cessation of terrorist activities in Afghanistan. By March 17, 2003 President Bush addressed the nation telling the American people Saddam Hussein and his sons must leave Iraq within 48hours. The ultimatum is carried out March 20, 2003 with the Invasion of Iraq. This began the current Iraq War. Prior to this invasion, the United States' official position was that Iraq is in violation of UN Security Council Resolution 1441 regarding weapons of mass destruction and has to be disarmed by force. No weapons of mass destruction were ever found. There was supposed to be some kind of linking of Saddam’s regime with terrorist training camps but I’m hard pressed to find anything I can quote supporting that idea now. Dodwell’s essay argues that the slipperiness of the term ‘cowboy’, the power of the cowbow myth, the anachronistic aspects of the historical cowboy and the blurry line between “the good” and “the bad” cowboy work to set up the oppositionalisms required to support and sustain the idea of going to war with Iraq and subsequent this, the war itself. There is also an insider-outsider dialectic supporting and sustaining the war energy with columnists and public figures of leading nations using the cowboy myth to paint a negative image of Bush as blood-thirsty and trigger-happy. Inside the US the cowboy image is used to garner support for Bush and war with Iraq in images reflecting black and white certainties. Here again exist the oppositionalisms required of the coin. The one coin’s two-faced form is a unity between the two sides of the one cowboy nation i.e. its face, the good and the bad in the one good in the cowboy’s action. He will eradicate the evil and bring evil to justice. Infinite Justice, by the way, was the original name for Operation Enduring Freedom, until Muslims complained this was something only God could dispense, and the name for fighting terrorism with terrorism in war was changed. The larger point is that the two faces in one coin, the cowboy image itself, tossed about the airwaves of the cowboy nation consistently and over time, is what re-energized and refueled the support for the war. A conservative outlook formulates the terra firma for energic good cowboy qualities and the polarizing liberal attitude reconstitutes the negative aspects of the bad cowboy but both sides work these negative associations to buoy the worldview of the national soul in its martial thrust. Dodwell’s findings conclude, “comparisons of Bush to a heroic cowboy may have propelled the U.S. into a war in a faster and more determined way than might otherwise have been the case.” What disturbs her, however, is the use of the cowboy myth, a pattern in the mind of a cowboy nation, as a pattern on the printed page that is generative toward action, in our case, war with Iraq. Next Week Two Faces, One Coin Part 3: The Cowboy Nation and Its Myth |
||
Archives Look Who's Blogging About This Essay Series Two Faces, One Coin Part 1: Gender Trouble Two Faces, One Coin Part 3 Two Faces, One Coin Part 4 Two Faces, One Coin Part 5 Interlude: Part 6 Two Faces, One Coin Two Faces, One Coin: Comments From Readers Termimus |
||
| |
|
![]() |
©
2001-2007 mythopoetry.com, All Rights Reserved
|
![]() |